THE FLASHES

The Twenty-Second Flash

AN ASTONISHING MANNER OF TREATMENT

It is well known that scholars everywhere regard matters from the standpoint of knowledge and learning. Wherever they encounter knowledge and scholarship, and in whomever they find them, they show friendship and respect out of regard for their calling. Even if a professor from a hostile country were to visit this land, its scholars would call upon him and honour him out of respect for his learning.

When England’s highest scientific council submitted six questions to the Council of the Shaykh al-Islām, requesting that they be answered in six hundred words, a scholar who had been treated with disrespect by the learned circles of this country answered all six questions in just six words, to widespread admiration.

Moreover, equipped with genuine knowledge and scholarship, he challenged the fundamental principles upheld by foreign scholars and philosophers in debate and emerged victorious. Drawing upon the power of the knowledge he had acquired from the Qur’an, he challenged the philosophers of Europe.

Six months before the proclamation of freedom, he invited both the religious scholars and the students of the modern schools in Istanbul to debate with him. Without putting a single question to them himself, he gave complete and correct answers to every question they posed.

He devoted his entire life to the happiness of this people, published hundreds of treatises in their own Turkish language, and thereby enlightened them.[1]

Yet it is certain individuals from learned circles and a small group of officially appointed hodjas who cause this scholar the greatest difficulties—a man who is also their compatriot, fellow believer, friend, and brother—and who even treat him with hostility and disrespect.

Consider, then: what name can be given to such conduct?

Is this civilisation? Is this love of knowledge and learning? Is this patriotism? Is this love for the people? Is this love for the republic?

No, no! It is none of these.

Rather, it is a decree of Divine destiny that hostility should arise from precisely those quarters where this scholar had expected friendship, lest the respect shown to him taint his knowledge with riyā, and so that he might attain ikhlās.

  1. The New Said says: At this point, I cannot agree with the somewhat boastful words of the Old Said. Yet, since I have given him leave to speak in this treatise, I cannot silence him. Therefore, in the face of those who are driven by their own egos, I allow him to display a little of his own self-regard, while I myself remain silent.

    ↩︎